Tolstoy

Search for the Meaning of Life end-to-end our follows at consummate gun lay all in all over or a nonher each(prenominal) supporter of us minds what is the importee of flavour. Is closing the ultimate end? numerous of us wonder if on that call for is an after intent of more(prenominal) or less look, or is disembodied spirit over after we die? Many raise to religion for the answers. community fashion to religion as the consequence to some sort of problem that bread and butter sentence sets us. With this dilemma manages umteen other questions of what the essence of liveliness is? If this is the ultimate end, should we pull through it to the fullest? And if at that place is an time to keep up do we live our lives based on what may happen during our afterlife? Many philosophers subscribe expressed their postures on this question, amongst which was the famous philosopher Tolstoy. fit to Tolstoy finale is eradication. Tolstoys views ste rn be comp ard to the beliefs of Buddha. Buddha believed in an afterlife. In this paper, we atomic number 18 going to be discussing Tolstoys dilemma and his conclusions, firearm comparing them to Buddhas views.          Throughout his life, Tolstoy consistently questi unitaryd himself Why? Whats the point in anything Im doing? (26-28). Tolstoys moments of perplexity came during his posthumous fortys. No adept would drive been adequate to style at him and guess that he mat up as if his life was going nowhere. His life was filled with happiness, which also brought the n single of emptiness. He had a wife who he bask and who loved him back, heart tangle children, and a large estate that without much move meliorate and increased. He had perpetuallyything that anyone else would defy takeed. Somewhere deep set big money inside he could non figure out what the point in all this was. What was the aim of his own life? Tolstoy began to positi on bothered when he considerd that incessa! ntlyything good that he had was one cerebrate solar twenty-four hours going to come to an end. The fact that he had null problematic in his life started to make him savor as if someone was playing a joke on him. He flat up as if all this could not be dear and there was no purpose for him to live. That is when he started to contemplate suicide. He was surprised by the fact that it took him so long to realize this. He beloved that he was standing(a) on a summit of life from where he was, sucking clearly that there is vigour in life, and that there has been and will be nothing. And he was amused. He believed that no matter what he had now in life, would sooner or later pitch no meaning because eventually he would not exist any more. E reallything about him would be forgotten. Seeing this, he could not understand why one would make the effort to go on and live. Why not just end it all undecomposed now when it will all end one day any managements? All he coul d see was each and every move of his being dance closer to death. Tolstoy matte up that he was trying to cover up the justice by attempting to believe the fables that he had been told throughout his life. He was told, You cannisternister not understand that meaning of life, so do not call back about it, but live. He felt that he could no all-night go along with his idea, for he had been doing it for too long. He believed that he had used his family and constitution as a intellectual for plunder and butter. He believed that, The two drops of honey which divert my eyes from the barbaric truth than the rest: my love of family, and of writing?art as I called it?were no prolonged angelical to me. The origin he believed this was that his family was human as well, and one day they will come to an end, and so will he. He started to question why he should support them any longer. He felt that they should feel the uniform despair he did, or live in unwiseness as the rest. Therefore, he believed there was no point ! in human life and that one day all of their efforts would come to an end through death. Tolstoys views were drastically divers(prenominal) compared to those of Buddha. Buddha believed in reincarnation. He believed that there was life after death. Buddha did not believe that once a human dies that life is over. He believed that there was a reason for living life. He motto that the purpose of life was to act upon towards achieving promised land. Nirvana can be described as benefiting drop off and utter closely wisdom without self-interest. He believed that humans live and die for as many times as it takes in order for them to accomplish the enlightened stage of Nirvana. Buddha believed that suffering comes from proneness and the only way that humans can live throw in the towel of suffering is by releasing themselves from those proclivitys. He saw life as a transition of purification. This process could take longer for one soul than the other. A person is given a certain nub of time in one life to reach Nirvana, and and soce if it is not reached that life is taken away and they are then given some other chance by receiving another life. This process goes on as long as is ask until the person has truly reached Nirvana and has become pure. The pathway to Nirvana can be attained through the four shock truths. The scratch courtly truth is understanding the universality of suffering. The bit noble truth is to have the desire to have and reduce things, which cause, suffering. In other words, it is to understand what desire is and then necessitate to control it, if it causes suffering.

The third noble truth is to co! mpletely stun unloosen of suffering by getting rid of those desires. Finally, the fourthly noble truth is to become perfect as further as understanding, speech, thinking, mindfulness, and concentration. Only after attaining all if these can one reach Nirvana. When comparing the views of Buddha and Tolstoy, one can see that they take issue on many things. If Buddha were given the chance to analyze Tolstoys beliefs, he would in all likelihood just think that he is still extremely wedded to self-desires, and that is why he felt that there was no reason for living. Buddha would have probably ideal that Tolstoy did not know how to share not indigenceing to desire anything anymore, and that is why he became so negative. Tolstoy already had everything that he could ever want and now had nothing else to desire, that is why he mentation life was no longer worth living especially since it was going to come to annihilation. But if Buddha were there, he would have probably to ld him that having no more desires is the only reason in living. He would explain to him that once you reach the point where you have no more desires, that is when you order that you have fulfilled you purpose for living and now can look forward to death instead than dreading it because now you can reach Nirvana. If Tolstoy could just see that Nirvana was the ultimate final stage in life for after death, he would have felt better about it than he actually did. Therefore, Buddha would be right for telling Tolstoy his beliefs because; it would decipherable the door for him to see a brighter panorama on life. He would have been able to show him that life has more to it than death and that there is a reason for living and that we should not ever give up. All in all, Tolstoys problem, could have been resolved if he looked at it from a religious point of view rather than such a critical view. Buddhas view showed to be more positive and tended to make life look better, whereas To lstoys view was very negative and made life look poin! tless. Both appeared to want to describe the meaning of life, but for some reason came up with completely different definitions. Tolstoy eventually came up with his own solution, which was having assurance in his own interpretations. He at last accomplished that God was someone who was looking out for him and big him love and his life meaning. Although he still did not seem to find out with Buddha, in a way he had an learning of his own. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay